A Formal General Setting for Dialogue Protocols
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we propose a general and abstract formal setting for argumentative dialogue protocols. We identify a minimal set of basic parameters that characterize dialogue protocols. By combining three parameters, namely the possibility or not of backtracking, the number of moves per turn and the turn-taking of the agents, we identify eight classes of protocols. We show that those classes can be reduced to three main classes: a ‘rigid’ class, an ‘intermediary’ one and a ‘flexible’ one. Although different proposals have been made for characterizing dialogue protocols, they usually take place in particular settings, where the locutions uttered and the commitments taken by the agents during dialogues and even the argumentation system that is involved are fixed. The present approach only assumes a minimal specification of the notion of dialogue essentially based on its external structure. This allows for protocol comparison and ensures the generality of the results.
منابع مشابه
Desiderata for dialogue-game protocols for agent interactions
Designers of agent communications protocols are increasingly using formal dialogue games, taken from the philosophy of argumentation. Based on our experiences in designing these, we propose a set of desiderata for such protocols.
متن کاملConcepts of Optimal Utterance in Dialogue: Selection and Complexity
Dialogue protocols have been the subject of considerable attention with respect to their potential applications in multiagent system environments. Formalisations of such protocols define classes of dialogue locutions, concepts of a dialogue state, and rules under which a dialogue proceeds. One important consideration in implementing a protocol concerns the criteria an agent should apply in choo...
متن کاملA short introduction to two approaches in formal verification of security protocols: model checking and theorem proving
In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all different behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this...
متن کاملCoherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
This article carries out a formal study of dialogue games for argumentation. A formal framework for such games is proposed which imposes an explicit reply structure on dialogues, where each dialogue move either attacks or surrenders to some earlier move of the other participant. The framework is flexible in several respects. It allows for different underlying logics, alternative sets of locutio...
متن کاملDesiderata for Agent Argumentation Protocols (Tracking number 215)
Designers of agent communications protocols are increasingly using formal dialogue games, adopted from argumentation theory, as the basis for structured agent interactions. We propose a set of desiderata for such protocols, drawing on recent research in agent interaction, on recent criteria for assessment of automated auction mechanisms and on elements of argumentation theory and political scie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006